Poetry vs. Philosophy

Note the similar structures of the Greek myth of Orpheus to that of the structure of the Symposium, by Plato. A feature Plato owes to Aristophanes, and ultimately Homer. Orpheus goes to Hades to retrieve his lost love (female), but returns empty handed. Due to the nature of the trip he no longer valued the gods, only One, Apollo. Orpheus went to pray to Apollo, but in a temple of Dionysus. Dionysus is angry and has him killed.

Dionysus is the key to the Symposium also. Substitute Alcibiades for Orpheus and you get the same logic. But who is Dionysus? None other than Socrates and his satyr Plato: [note the logic, not the narrative. Strauss says "The place of Dionysus is taken by Alcibiades who decides in favor of Socrates. So you see how elegantly Plato pays Aristophanes back." Remember the mysteries "... and the man who divulged them was Socrates himself" p. 24. A lesson on how to read irony.] 

How is Alcibiades punished? By slander, which results in the death of his political career, and subsequently the loss of the Peloponnesian war with the Spartans. This has become the paradigm of the subversion of Western Civilization by a group of resentful males known as homosexuals and is being played out today in the division of the Straussians into West and East coast versions. The East Coast nihilists are emerging as victorious. Dividing the Straussians is too close to the division of humans into male and female by Zeus, as told by Aristophanes in the Symposium, to be merely coincidental.

Hopefully, rereading Strauss will open a path forward.

X

 Q1)  (video @ post) Should you allow these people to rise up and embed themselves in the most important positions in your country, when they literally oppose the existence of your nation-state and everything you believe in? And if you call them out, you're the bad guy!

A1) In philosophical terms it's called "the One and the Many." But the homosexuals are far ahead of the Jews, hence your video the other day about homosexual "Jews", if there is such a thing. Strauss, and perhaps Nietzsche, saw it coming. Perhaps you should read more and post less.

The big picture is on East Coast vs. West Coast Straussians.

https://newrepublic.com/article/137410/pro-trump-intellectuals-want-overthrow-america

What you are so unhappily experiencing is the emergence of the East Coast Nihilists.

1/2 The nimble balance is letting some people do what freedom entails while maintaining a hegemony on family. This is the big picture, one that I have to struggle through every day because the distinction between “east and west” is so subtile.

2/2 You can’t have that balance in a homophobic environment. Homophobia is a force used as leverage against Freedom. When there is a compulsion to be "normal," in a socially constraining sense, unintentional instincts are bred into the mix. Homophobia is used as a force for an intentional design of breeding, in an ironic sense. This can be looked at as a more "user friendly" (not personally) version of the "annihilation of the mass" than biological warfare. It is, however, imperative that a clear theory of healthy heterosexual culture needs to be made due to the fact that some people are heterosexual and reproductively sensitive to the quantity of the population. Hence, a tradition that focuses on healthy family.

 

In short: the evolution of the heterosexual mind.

Also called "Natural Right."

A semiotic theory of definition

  Second-ness gives continuity to interpretation. 

This is based on my interpretation of Peirce’s categories demonstrated through his Existential Graphs in the order, outside to inside: 2,1,3.

This offers a fruitful perspective on the semantics of the term ‘Lord’: “denotes the head of a household in his relation to servants and dependents who ‘eat his bread’.” O.E.D.

Lord 2nd-ness. Not too catchy, but sound.

N.B.: This is not the good in-itself and wise of Plato’s Timaeus.

Nous

 Mind is the measure of all things.