Saturday, March 20, 2021

What is a Sign?

Another thread pulled Peirce and Jung’s work together for me, their understanding of the self as a symbol (233).

 

Symbols grow. They come into being by development out of other signs, particularly from likenesses or from mixed signs partaking of the nature of likenesses and symbols. We think only in signs. These mental signs are of mixed nature; the symbol-parts of them are called concepts. If a man makes a new symbol, it is by thoughts involving concepts. So it is only out of symbols that a new symbol can grow. Omne symbolum de symbolo. A symbol, once in being, spreads among the peoples. In use and in experience, its meaning grows. Such words as force, law, wealth, marriage, bear for us very different meanings from those they bore to our barbarous ancestors. The symbol may, with Emerson’s sphynx, say to man,


Of thine eye I am eyebeam.


In all reasoning, we have to use a mixture of likenesses, indices, and symbols. We cannot dispense with any of them. The complex whole may be called a symbol; for its symbolic, living character is the prevailing one. A metaphor is not always to be despised: though a man may be said to be composed of living tissues, yet portions of his nails, teeth, hair, and bones, which are most necessary to him, have ceased to undergo the metabolic processes which constitute life, and there are liquids in his body which are not alive. Now, we may liken the indices we use in reasoning to the hard parts of the body, and the likenesses we use to the blood: the one holds us stiffly up to the realities, the other with its swift changes supplies the nutriment for the main body of thought.



Peirce, C. S., Houser, N., Eller, J. R., Lewis, A. C., De, T. A., Clark, C. L., Davis, D. B., ... Peirce Edition Project. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 2, 1893-1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.